
Thomas Chatterton Manuscript Project
About the Manuscript Project
The Project - Ten Years & Counting
The Thomas Chatterton Manuscript Project was created by Ó Fionnalláin, aka : (Qe!) et al,
​
I have to say, 'so you know where you stand with me', that I have a real fondness for all Chattertonian writers; biographers, bibliographers, essayists, editors, and chancers (Dix, Wilcox, Croft, Catcott, perhaps I should add an etc to this list, don't you think?), whether their work be large or small, derivative or otherwise - there is usually something to delight about the work or the individual!
​
As I write this I am surrounded by an array of Chatterton related books and periodicals, all of which I have used to work up the project - and yesterday (an actual date is not required as it could be any yesterday), I bought yet another Chatterton related book. The madness (you might think it a madness) is that I already own three copies of the same book.
Let me change your mind about my madness :
The book is William Barrett's rather large, 4to, History of Bristol, 1789 and it has an engraving tipped in of Rymsdick's portrait of Barrett himself, it's the first one I have ever seen available for sale, although it will now probably start popping up on various online sites. The reason for owning more than one copy makes sense when you consider what extra knowledge you might gain from any annotations - an example is a description of Chatterton written by William Seward onto the front free endpapers of a copy of George Gregory’s The Life of Chatterton, 1789.
So many books and so many writers, yet the Thomas Chatterton Manuscript Project is driven by two writers, Edward Harry William Meyerstein, via his 'A Life of Thomas Chatterton,' and Donald S. Taylor, via his 'The Complete Works of Thomas Chatterton'.
​
A work I must also mention is Thomas Chatterton 1752-1770, An Annotated Bibliography,' by Jean C. Rowles, A.L.A. It's a wonderful piece of work 'submitted for fellowship of the Library Association, October 1981'. I have recently heard that Jean has passed on. I learned of Jean's work from Dawn Dyer of (Bristol Library), for which I owe her my thanks.
​
Over the last few years I have taken thousands of photographs of manuscripts, postcards, newspapers and magazines, in fact all sorts of artefacts and ephemera. I am so fortunate that two of my favourite places, the absolutely wonderful, Bristol Reference Library, and Bristol Archives, are the source of most of my images to-date.
​
Manuscripts uploaded to the Chatterton Project, include some by the following writers: Thomas Chatterton (obviously); George Catcott; Alexander Catcott; Alex Stopford Catcott; William Barrett; Dr Fry; Dr Lort; Thomas Tyrwhitt; Richard Smith; William Blake; and Horace Walpole.
​George Catcott, by transcribing Chatterton's works, played the key role in publicising Rowley; good old George was very, very prolific.
​
Who to trust? You might ask why I often present the original manuscript along with the first and second printings? I do this because the project is about presenting the earliest documents and whatever proofs are available. This will allow the reader to judge for themselves and not be swayed by the writer.
​
Ó Fionnalláin
Project Update
I work on many different aspects of the Project daily; currently I am working on the following:
​​​
-
Adding pages dedicated to the many names involved in the Chatterton story.
-
Bristowe Tragedie - making all copies available for easy comparison.
-
Transcribing the impossible scrawl of Michael Lort - I appreciate that they were notes to himself and not us.
​
-
I have finished adding the titles of all of Chatterton's genuine works, plus works of doubtful authenticity, lost works and works incorrectly claimed as Chatterton's, and am now working on the next step; preparing and uploading images of original manuscripts or first printings to each of the titles - this might take a while.
​
However, however, however, I have already uploaded many manuscripts and first printings, but I still have lots of titles waiting for the link to the manuscript or first printing to go live. I will be trying to upload them daily, so do click a title and hope for the best. If you can't find a specific item do let me know and I will try to supply it.
​
I like to do the above online and in real time because this allows anyone interested in Chatterton to see these wonderful documents as soon as I have them ready.
If you would like to collaborate by photographing manuscripts local to you or have any questions or suggestions, do let me know Contact me .
​
Question everything & accept nothing but an image, if it exists, of the original manuscript. If the original is lost I will upload first printing of the work.
​
I do hope you find the website interesting -:- May your research be filled with joy;
From the editor & originator of the TCMP (Thomas Chatterton Manuscript Project) :-
Reading Manuscripts via Google Docs
Original manuscripts from the 18th century can be difficult to read; this applies especially to Chattertonian Manuscripts. For this reason, as well as controlling costs, I use Google Docs to present high quality images of manuscripts, which allows close-up and almost forensic views. The website can be viewed in all of its beauty on any platform, however, if you wish to study the original manuscripts on a Mobile Phone or Tablet (but why would you - that way madness lies), you would be best served by downloading the Google Docs App, which is also available via the Apple app store etc.
Time to be serious: when studying stuff like this you should be using a Laptop or PC, rather than a mobile or tablet. This is because the manuscripts, thanks to the settings on mobile or tablet, sometimes appear 'fuzzy,' which can, of course, be adjusted, but it does make viewing awkward - Read more about settings for mobiles and tablets.
​
Contact me if you need anything specific :-
My imprint throughout is QE! because I question everything! I also masquerade as George Symes Catcott and William Barrett, et al
Collaborate - The Project Needs YOU !
Chattertonian Manuscripts are widely distributed making it extremely difficult to view or study them. We either live too far away or don't have the accreditation that gets us into the hallowed libraries of massy knowledge.
​
The Project aims to ensure that high quality & zoomable images of all Chattertonian Manuscripts are freely available on the Project Website for study and collaboration or simply for the joy of it!
It is too costly for me to do all of this alone, although I will continue to try. So, if you are near to any source of original Chattertonian documents and can find the time, do consider helping by photographing them for the Project. All you need is a smartphone; do send me an email if you are able to help.
​
Even Horace Walpole's 'Shade,' thanks to the collecting zeal of Lefty-Lewis (Lewis Walpole Library, Yale University), has its hands on Chattertonian Manuscripts.
​
I have been working steadily on the project for a number of years and have, to date, uploaded numerous manuscripts but still have hundreds to collate, crop, adjust, delete, prepare & upload - a true labour of love!
​
So many of the Manuscripts in Bristol Reference Library and Archives are in the autograph of George Symes Catcott, a friend and mentor to Chatterton. He seems never to have let the quill pen fall from his inky fingers.
​
The good news is that Chatterton Manuscripts outside of Bristol will often be one or two pages only, which is much less onerous on the person taking the photographs. Spare a thought for me, one of Catcott's Copy Books, which contains over 533 pages, took weeks to photograph & prepare for uploading.
​
Bristol & London are the key locations for Chatterton manuscripts, but there are a few in English and American Universities.
Finally, do let me know if I can help your Chatterton researches in any way.
Chatterton Documents Consumed by Fire
Another reason to get on with the Project
Daniel Wilson's 1869 biography of Chatterton mentions the 1860 fire in Kerslake's Shop. It was originally reported in The Bristol Times & Felix Farley's Journal for Feb 18th 1860.
​
The fire destroyed "Manuscript Chattertoniana" collected by J. M. Gutch, and William Tyson, and further augmented by Thomas Kerslake'. It also consumed the infamous Fust manuscript.
​
Then, 20 years later, on October 9th, 1881, the 'Great Fire' in Canynges' House, Bristol, destroyed the stock of C. T. Jefferies, Printer & Bookseller. Fortunately the fabulous Canynges fireplace shown in the painting by E. H. Parkman, survived the fire - see below.
The Blitz
Chattertonian Documents and Alexander Catcott's Fossil Collection were destroyed when bombs landed on Temple Church and Bristol Museum.
​
Heads Up
Irreplaceable Manuscripts should be photographed ASAP! If funding is short, opt for the low cost and simple option - use a smartphone - it does an excellent job, which allows forensic views. The Images on this website show what can be achieved.


John Ross Dix - The Chancer
I know I go against the norm with my liking for John Dix (the ultimate chancer), but his 1837 edition of The Life of Thomas Chatterton, was my introduction to Chatterton. It became my own first chief curse, with, perhaps, too much time given to this one subject. I bought the book for £5 from a Bristol bookshop in the 1970s. Those were the days - no need to wear a mask, unless you were robbing a bank!
​
You know you want to see the actual book, yes you do, well here it is:


The minute I picked the book up I was captivated. The annotations were intriguing, a direct challenge to discover more! The portrait was a 'fake' tell me more of this too!
​
Yes, I found the Athenaeum online. Yes I discovered what the Latin words meant! Yes I discovered more about Chatterton & yes I love exclamation marks!!!; I am quite the fan of semi-colons too!
So, what was all the fuss about after publication of Dix's Life of Chatterton? Well, Dix was reviled because he had no regard for the truth and would create 'facts' to enliven the story - starting with the image of Chatterton, which turned out to be a painting of the son of Mr Morris, the artist. It's true, that Dix (actually, George Spenser Phillips, c. 1800-1865) clouded the Chatterton story but it is easy to discover the rights and wrongs of it with the help of Meyerstein and Taylor.
I look at it like this: Dix was to Chatterton what Hofmann was to the Mormons, beyond annoying in so many ways, but at least Dix didn't kill anyone, and he certainly stirred things up a bit! What he lacks in truth he makes up with colour; was he writing a biography, obviously not, in fact it feels little more than a 'penny dreadful' story. Dix's book is now a part of Chatterton's story and it will remain so, it adds colour and confusion and is entertaining. It will remain one of my favourite books (because it was my first) regardless of its inaccuracies and downright fictions!
​
At this point, making no allowance for my own feelings, I must interject with a link to the publication Notes and Queries, for April 13, 1872. It contains an article by Walter Thornbury, noted by Meyerstein, which puts Dix firmly in his place, and it starts most fabulously with :
"It is necessary to sometimes nail up fresh vermin on the barn-door of infamy, already sufficiently crowded."
​
View the full article online Or read my verbatim transcript of it below:​
Walter Thornbury's
Review of Dix's Life of Chatterton
Temporary position for John Dix - he will be getting his own barn page.​
"It is necessary to sometimes nail up fresh vermin on the barn-door of infamy, already sufficiently crowded.
One of the most shameless literary forgers of the present century was John Dix, alias John Ross–a man who wrote a short 8vo Life of Chatterton, which was published in Bristol in 1837. This writer, who many years ago fled to America, was first publicly exposed by that acute critic Mr. Moy Thomas in The Athenæum of Dec. 5, 1857, when Mr. Thomas proved a report of the proceedings of the inquest on the body of Chatterton, forwarded by this Mr. Dix to Mr. J. M. Gutch of Worcester, and afterwards published in "N. & Q.," to be a shameless and badly invented forgery. Mr. Thomas, with the keen sagacity that distinguishes him, showed that except where Mr. Dix follows the scanty notes of Warton, or that not very scrupulous literary adventurer, Sir Herbert Croft (himself a great mixer of truth with fiction, vide his Love and Madness, his spurious and absurdly romantic imaginary letters of the Reverend Mr. Hackman and Miss Reay, the mistress of the Earl of Sandwich), he was always inventing.
Mr. Dix, in the aforesaid report, mentions the "Three Crows" in Brooke Street—a public-house which there is every reason to suppose never existed, and he makes the date of the inquest Friday, August 27, 1770, when it happened, unfortunately, to be a Monday, the 27th of that year. He also makes the house where Chatterton died No. 17, whereas, as Mr. Thomas most ingeniously and convincingly proved, it was really No. 39.
In reply to this exposure, Mr. Dix, still in retirement in America, wrote a letter to the Boston Saturday Evening Gazette, impudently agreeing with Mr. Thomas that the report of the inquest was a fraud. It had been given to him, he said (credat Judaeus) by the late Robert Southey at the time he, Dix, was writing the Life of Chatterton. Considering it unauthentic, he, Dix, did not use the copy of the report taken by him from the anonymous document returned by him, or said to be returned by him, to Southey, who was then, by-the-bye, lying in a quiet place where no persons are either asked or answered.
​
Mr. Thomas, in a second letter to The Atheneum, January 23, 1858, complained with natural anger that Mr. Dix had let five years since the publication of the report elapse without explanation; and also that, considering the document a forgery, he gave a copy of it without comment to Mr. Gutch of Worcester; moreover, like all literary men of London or Boston, that he must have known that the romantic report of the inquest had been interwoven into an elaborate essay on Chatterton by Professor Masson, and had been made the basis of an elaborate pamphlet on the boy poet by Dr. Maitland.
​
In the above-named letter Mr. Dix had the shamelessness to almost openly avow that the portrait of Chatterton affixed to the first edition of the Life was also a forgery. The likeness was really taken from the hydrocephalous son of a poor Bristol printer named Morris (?), who in mere caprice had written "Chatterton" on the back of the portrait and sold it for a mere song to a Bristol broker. From him it reached Dix, who instantly jumping at it, had it engraved. No authentic portrait of Chatterton exists, and in Dix's edition of 1851 the likeness was left out. It took, it appears, Mr. Dix years to discover this fact about the portrait, which was known to several Bristol people the very year of Dix's publication.
​
After these disclosures, how can we place any reliance on the Chatterton traditions in Dix's book? How can we credit the doubtful and miserable verses found after the poet's death, the legend of his body being carried secretly to Bristol and buried in Redcliffe churchyard, or even the pretty story of the poet when a mere child, on being asked what device he would have painted on a mug, exclaiming, with the fire of genius "Paint me an angel with wings and a trumpet, to trumpet my name over the world."
​
Indeed in this last almost too good story I think I detect a Dix flavour. Dreadful doubts also come into my mind about the appendix to the Life, "Communicated by G. Cumberland, Esq.," that once used to delight me, and which pretends to be notes of conversations with the scholars and friends of Chatterton's mother, written down as early as 1808. I doubt half the letters, even the interesting anecdote (too interesting, I fear) about how the boy forger used to lock himself in a back room and in Redcliffe church with old parchments, and reappear with hands and face begrimed with ochre and charcoal.
The career so gallantly commenced by Dix in 1837 was continued somewhat subterraneanly. In 1846 the noble exile produced Local Loiterings and Visits in Boston, by a Looker on. We cannot trace him again in his dark windings, till 1847, when the Bristol Museum cataloguer notes John Dix, author of The Poor Orphan, as the printer or author of Jack Ariel, or Life on Board an Indiaman. This book reached a second edition in 1852, and a third edition in 1859. The last edition has on the title page, "By the author of Travels in America"---a work not catalogued at the British Museum. In 1850 appeared a book full of most impudent fabrications, called Pen-and-Ink Sketches of Eminent English Literary Personages, by a Cosmopolitan; in 1852 he produced A Handbook to Newport and Rhode Island, and the same year a work of imagination, still more slovenly than usual, and called Lions Living and Dead—a book abounding in mistakes of all kinds, and full of imaginary conversations between the author, Coleridge, Hazlitt, &c. According to the author's own account, he was actually present when Shelley tried to induce an old gentleman at Hampstead to take care of a poor woman whom the poet had found fainting in the streets. Thom, the weaver poet, who had befriended Dix, is cruelly maligned. Altogether the work is below contempt. In 1853 Dix wrote a feeble book which he named Passages from the Diary of a Wasted Life, but which is little more than a fulsome eulogy of the American temperance orator, Mr. John B. Gough. In 1854 this miserable man produced Pen Pictures of distinguished American Divines, and probably not long after died, for he has since that forged no more.
​
In his Lions Living and Dead, Dix says of Bristol that "It is a place which has damned more talent than perhaps any other place in Queen Victoria's dominions. I speak strongly, but I do so with all my heart and soul." There writes the exile of a city which had seen his disgrace. It is as well that American literary men should know how miserably unreliable are the imaginary conversations of this literary chevalier d'industrie, who has muddied so many subjects with wilful untruths.
​
It is curious to see how lies breed lies. As Macpherson led to Chatterton, so Chatterton was followed by Dix. It is to the eternal disgrace of this John Dix, alias John Ross, that he has confused, entangled, and corrupted the subject of Chatterton's life in such a way that only the last day can ever set it right.
WALTER THORNBURY. "

Here's a friendly little Chattertonian Manuscript Riddle: